El Desarrollo del Estudio de Lecciones en Malasia: Problemas y Desafíos y su Contribución a la Educación Matemática

  • Ui Hock Cheah
    uhcheah@recsam.edu.my
Palabras clave: Lesson Study. Desarrollo Profesional de los Docentes. Préstamo Educativo. Comunidad profesional.

Resumen

Este articulo examina el desarrollo del Lesson Study en Malasia. El Lesson Study se introdujo en Malasia como estudios de investigación a pequeña escala a partir de 2004. Esto siguió a la participación del país en el Proyecto de Lesson Study del APEC HRDWG como parte de cooperación internacional. En 2011, el Lesson Study fue mejorado, reconceptualizado e incluido en el Professional Learning Community Project nacional (en espanol, Proyecto Comunitario de Aprendizaje Profesional nacional). Si bien los comentarios generales de estos eventos muestran el gran potencial del Lesson Study en curso como un enfoque de desarrollo profesional, también hubo una falta de confianza entre los maestros para implementar el Lesson Study por su cuenta. Este artículo discute las implicaciones de estos eventos desde el punto de vista de las necesidades de la comunidad profesional de educación matemática. El texto incluye sugerencias para revitalizar y sostener el Lesson Study en Malasia.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Ui Hock Cheah
South East Asian Ministers of Education Organisation Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics, Penang, Malaysia

Citas

Artigue, M., Bosch, M., Chaachoua, H., Chellougui, F., Chesnais, A., Durand-Guerrier, V., ... & Trouche, L. (2019). The French didactic tradition in mathematics. In W. Blum, M. Artigue, M. A. Mariotti, R. Sträßer & M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Eds.), European traditions in didactics of mathematics (pp. 11-56). Springer.
Baba, T. (2013). Professional competence and professional community in mathematics education. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 36(2), 105-120.
Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. (n.d.). Komuniti pembelajaran professional. Strategi 2: Amalan penswastaan. [Professional Learning Community. Strategy 2: De-privatization of practice]. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Cheah, U. H. (2001). The construction of mathematical beliefs by trainee teachers in a teachers college: A multiple case study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Cheah, U. H. (2012). Implementing teaching and learning innovations through lesson study: Mathematical thinking and communication. SEAMEO RECSAM
Cheah, U. H. (2013). A design research approach towards development of curricular materials: The case of modelling ratio and proportions. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Proceedings: The 6th East Asia conference on mathematics education (EARCOME 6) 3, (pp. 51-60). Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Khon Kaen University.
Cheah, U. H. (2018). Designing instruction in geometry: Using lesson study to improve classroom teaching. In P. Herbst, U. H. Cheah, P. Richard, & K. Jones (Eds.), International perspectives on the teaching and learning of geometry in secondary schools (pp. 181-196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77476-3_11
Cheah, U. H., & Mustapha, Z. (2012). Enabling the professional learning among teachers of low performing schools in Malaysia through lesson study: Aspiration and challenges. Paper Presented at the APEID Hiroshima Seminar “Innovation for the Promotion of Lesson Study in Asia and Pacific Regions” held at the Hiroshima University in Japan on 6-9 March, 2012
Chevallard, Y., & Sensevy, G. (2014). Anthropological approaches in mathematics education: French perspectives. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 38-43). Springer.
Chew, C. M., & Lim, C. S. (2014). Primary mathematics teachers’ stages of concern about the implementation of lesson study. In A. L. White, S. Tahir, & U. H. Cheah (Eds.), Empowering the future generation through mathematics education (pp. 52-63). SEAMEO Regional Cenre for Education in Science and Mathematics.
Chew, C. M., Lim, C. S., Wun, T. H., & Lim, H. L. (2013). Enhancing pre-service secondary teachers’ Geometer’s Sketchpad activities for teaching1 mathematics through lesson study. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Proceedings: The 6th East Asia conference on mathematics education (EARCOME 6)3, (pp. 79-89). Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Khon Kaen University.
Chiew, C. M., Goh, S. I., & Kim T. S. (2013). Implement and sustain lesson study from mathematics teachers’ perspective. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Proceedings: The 6th East Asia conference on mathematics education (EARCOME 6) 3, (pp. 90-93). Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Khon Kaen University.
Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of teachers. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 37-48). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cocklin, B. (1991). Back to school: A model of the process of becoming an adult student. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(1), 3-21.
Cockroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Educational Planning and Research Division (2007). Bahan kursus kajian tindakan 2007 [Action research course material 2007]. Retrieved on 12 September 2008 from http://apps.emoe.gov.my/bppdp/kajian%20Tindakan%202007/index_kajian%20tindakan%202007.htm
Ghani, Z. (1988). Curricular decision-making in the diffusion of educational innovation in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Inprasitha, M. (2011). One feature of adaptive lesson study in Thailand: Designing a learning unit. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 34(1), 47-66.
Karp, A. (2013). From the local to the international in mathematics education. In M.A. Clements et al., (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 797-826). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action research planner (3rd edition). Deakin University Press
Kim, P. L. (2005). The environments of action research in Malaysia. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International action research: Educational reform (pp.238-260). Routledge.
Kor, L. K., & Lim, C. S. (2009). Lesson study: A potential driving force behind the innovative use of Geometer’s Sketchpad. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 69-82.
Kor, L. K., Tan, S. F., & Lim, C. S. (2019). Capturing changes and differences in teacher reflection through lesson study: A comparison of two culturally diverse Malaysian primary schools. In Huang, R., Takahashi, A., da Ponte, J.P. (Eds.), Theory and practice of lesson study in mathematics. An international perspective (pp. 369-391). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_18
Lee, C. S. (1982). Reform in mathematics education in Malaysia. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 2(2), 34-40.
Lee, M. N.N. (1999). Education in Malaysia: Towards Vision 2020, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/ 10.1076/sesi.10.1.86.3514
Lewis, C. (1995). Educating hearts and minds: Reflections on Japanese preschool and elementary education. Cambridge University Press.
Lim, C. S., & Chiew, C. M. (2015). Initiating lesson study to promote good practices: A Malaysian experience. In M. Inprasitha, M. Isoda, P. Wang-Iverson & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Lesson study: Challenges in mathematics education (pp. 255-272). World Scientific.
Lim, C. S., Kor, L. K., & Chia, H. M. (2016). Revitalising mathematics classroom teaching through Lesson Study (LS): A Malaysian case study. ZDM Mathematics Education 48, 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0779-7
Lim, C. S., Teh, K. H., & Chiew, C. M. (2018). Promoting and implementing lesson study in Malaysia: Issue of sustainability. In M. Quaresma, C. Winsløw, S. Clivaz, J. P. da Ponte, A. N. Shúilleabháin & A. Takahashi (Eds.), Mathematics lesson study around the world: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 47-64). Springer.
Lim, C. S., White, A. L., & Chiew C. M. (2005). Promoting mathematics teacher collaboration through lesson study. What can we learn from two countries’ experience? Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of the Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project: “Reform, Revolution and Paradigm Shifts in Mathematics Education” in Cooperation with the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Nov. 25-Dec. 1, 2005. Johor Baru, Malaysia
Mahathir, M. (1979). Laporan jawatankuasa kabinet mengkaji pelaksanaan dasar pelajaran [Cabinet committee report on the implementation of educational policies]. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Miyakawa, T. (2007). Textbooks and teaching guides. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara & T. Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational development (pp. 48-51). World Scientific.
National Institute for Educational Policy Research. (2006). Best practices in professional learning of science and mathematics teachers. National Institute for Educational Policy Research (NIER), Tokyo. http://www.apecneted.org/resources/downloads/BestPractice MSTeacher_NIER2005Nov.pdf
PEMANDU (2010). Government transformation programme: The roadmap. Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia.
Phillips, D. (2009). Aspects of educational transfer. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp.1061-1077). Springer.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003) Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451-461.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784.
Shimizu, Y. (2007). Understanding Japanese mathematics lessons. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara & T. Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational development (pp. 64-67). World Scientific.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving in the classroom. The Free Press.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational leadership, 61(5), 12-17.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999074.pdf
Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 513-526.
Teh, K. H. (2013). A comparative study of the efficacy between the clinal supervision and lesson study approach for teaching practicum. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Proceedings: The 6th East Asia conference on mathematics education (EARCOME 6)3, (pp. 258-265). Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Khon Kaen University.
United States National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. National Commission on Excellence in Education.
White, A. L., & Lim, C. S. (2008). Lesson study in Asia Pacific classrooms: Local responses to a global movement. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 915-925.
Zawojewski, J., Chamberlin, M., Hjalmarson, M. A., & Lewis, C. (2008). Developing design studies in mathematics education professional development. In A. E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh & J.Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 219-239). Routledge.
Publicado
2023-05-06
Métricas
  • Visualizaciones del Artículo 45
  • PDF (English) downloads: 42
Cómo citar
Cheah, U. H. (2023). El Desarrollo del Estudio de Lecciones en Malasia: Problemas y Desafíos y su Contribución a la Educación Matemática. PARADIGMA, 44(2), 36-60. https://doi.org/10.37618/PARADIGMA.1011-2251.2023.p36-60.id1411